What matters when managing childhood fever in the emergency department? A discrete-choice experiment comparing the preferences of parents and healthcare professionals in the UK

Leigh, S, Robinson, J ORCID: 0000-0001-5491-4893, Yeung, S, Coenen, F ORCID: 0000-0003-1026-6649, Carrol, ED ORCID: 0000-0001-8357-7726 and Niessen, LW (2020) What matters when managing childhood fever in the emergency department? A discrete-choice experiment comparing the preferences of parents and healthcare professionals in the UK Archives of Disease in Childhood, 105 (8). pp. 765-771. ISSN 0003-9888, 1468-2044

Text ADC DCE Main_document_Revision_CLEAN.accepted deposit.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (62kB)

Abstract

Background Fever among children is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) attendance and a diagnostic conundrum; yet robust quantitative evidence regarding the preferences of parents and healthcare providers (HCPs) for managing fever is scarce. Objective To determine parental and HCP preferences for the management of paediatric febrile illness in the ED. Setting Ten children's centres and a children's ED in England from June 2018 to January 2019. Participants 98 parents of children aged 0-11 years, and 99 HCPs took part. Methods Nine focus-groups and coin-ranking exercises were conducted with parents, and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with both parents and HCPs, which asked respondents to choose their preferred option of several hypothetical management scenarios for paediatric febrile illness, with differing levels of visit time, out-of-pocket costs, antibiotic prescribing, HCP grade and pain/discomfort from investigations. Results The mean focus-group size was 4.4 participants (range 3-7), with a mean duration of 27.4 min (range 18-46 min). Response rates to the DCE among parents and HCPs were 94.2% and 98.2%, respectively. Avoiding pain from diagnostics, receiving a faster diagnosis and minimising wait times were major concerns for both parents and HCPs, with parents willing-to-pay £16.89 for every 1 hour reduction in waiting times. Both groups preferred treatment by consultants and nurse practitioners to treatment by doctors in postgraduate training. Parents were willing to trade-off considerable increases in waiting times (24.1 min) to be seen by consultants and to avoid additional pain from diagnostics (45.6 min). Reducing antibiotic prescribing was important to HCPs but not parents. Conclusions Both parents and HCPs care strongly about reducing visit time, avoiding pain from invasive investigations and receiving diagnostic insights faster when managing paediatric febrile illness. As such, overdue advances in diagnostic capabilities should improve child and carer experience and HCP satisfaction considerably in managing paediatric febrile illness.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Humans, Fever, Health Care Surveys, Focus Groups, Models, Statistical, Attitude of Health Personnel, Parents, Choice Behavior, Adult, Middle Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Health Personnel, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Male, Time-to-Treatment, United Kingdom
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	12 Mar 2020 10:53
Last Modified:	01 Mar 2026 03:11
DOI:	10.1136/archdischild-2019-318209
Related Websites:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3078730
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.