Structural similarities between some common fluorophores used in biology and marketed drugs, endogenous metabolites, and natural products



O’Hagan, Steve and Kell, Douglas
(2019) Structural similarities between some common fluorophores used in biology and marketed drugs, endogenous metabolites, and natural products.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background It is known that at least some fluorophores can act as ‘surrogate’ substrates for solute carriers (SLCs) involved in pharmaceutical drug uptake, and this promiscuity is taken to reflect at least a certain structural similarity. As part of a comprehensive study seeking the ‘natural’ substrates of ‘orphan’ transporters that also serve to take up pharmaceutical drugs into cells, we have noted that many drugs bear structural similarities to natural products. A cursory inspection of common fluorophores indicates that they too are surprisingly ‘drug-like’, and they also enter at least some cells. Some are also known to be substrates of efflux transporters. Consequently, we sought to assess the structural similarity of common fluorophores to marketed drugs, endogenous mammalian metabolites, and natural products. We used a set of some 150 fluorophores. Results The great majority of fluorophores tested exhibited significant similarity (Tanimoto similarity > 0.75) to at least one drug as judged via descriptor properties (especially their aromaticity, for identifiable reasons that we explain), by molecular fingerprints, by visual inspection, and via the “quantitative estimate of drug likeness” technique. It is concluded that this set of fluorophores does overlap a significant part of both drug space and natural products space. Consequently, fluorophores do indeed offer a much wider opportunity than had possibly been realised to be used as surrogate uptake molecules in the competitive or trans-stimulation assay of membrane transporter activities.

Item Type: Article
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 16 Apr 2020 14:48
Last Modified: 03 Mar 2021 10:42
DOI: 10.1101/834325
Open Access URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/834325v1
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3082708