Roper, L 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2918-7628, Lyttle, MD, Gamble, C ORCID: 0000-0002-3021-1955, Humphreys, A, Messahel, S, Lee, ED, Noblet, J, Hickey, H ORCID: 0000-0003-0467-0362, Rainford, N, Iyer, A et al (show 2 more authors)
(2021)
Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
Emergency Medicine Journal, 38 (3).
pp. 198-204.
ISSN 1472-0205, 1472-0213
|
Text
2020 EMJ Seven Step.pdf - Published version Download (447kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the trial. As part of an embedded study in the 'Emergency treatment with Levetiracetam or Phenytoin in Status Epilepticus in children' (EcLiPSE) trial, we explored how practitioners described the trial and RWPC during recruitment discussions, and how well this information was understood by parents. We aimed to develop a framework to assist trial conversations in future paediatric emergency and critical care trials using RWPC. Methods Qualitative methods embedded within the EcLiPSE trial processes, including audiorecorded practitioner-parent trial discussions and telephone interviews with parents. We analysed data using thematic analysis, drawing on the Realpe et al (2016) model for recruitment to trials. Results We analysed 76 recorded trial discussions and conducted 30 parent telephone interviews. For 19 parents, we had recorded trial discussion and interview data, which were matched for analysis. Parental understanding of the EcLiPSE trial was enhanced when practitioners: provided a comprehensive description of trial aims; explained the reasons for RWPC; discussed uncertainty about which intervention was best; provided a balanced description of trial intervention; provided a clear explanation about randomisation and provided an opportunity for questions. We present a seven-step framework to assist recruitment practice in trials involving RWPC. Conclusion This study provides a framework to enhance recruitment practice and parental understanding in paediatric emergency and critical care trials involving RWPC. Further testing of this framework is required.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | paediatric emergency med, qualitative research, research, clinical, research, methods |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2020 09:34 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Mar 2026 09:50 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/emermed-2020-209488 |
| Related Websites: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3099658 |
| Disclaimer: | The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate. |
Altmetric
Altmetric