What is the Incoherence Objection to Legal Entrapment?

Hill, Daniel J ORCID: 0000-0003-4546-8662, McLeod, Stephen K ORCID: 0000-0003-1457-2942 and Tanyi, Attila ORCID: 0000-0002-2027-9446 (2022) What is the Incoherence Objection to Legal Entrapment? Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 22 (1). pp. 47-73.

Text Incoherence Objection JESP v4 ELEMENTS.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (96kB)

Abstract

<jats:p>Some legal theorists say that legal entrapment to commit a crime is incoherent. So far, there is no satisfactorily precise statement of this objection in the literature: it is obscure even as to the type of incoherence that is purportedly involved. (Perhaps consequently, substantial assessment of the objection is also absent.) We aim to provide a new statement of the objection that is more precise and more rigorous than its predecessors. We argue that the best form of the objection asserts that, in attempting to entrap, law-enforcement agents lapse into a form of practical incoherence that involves the attempt simultaneously to pursue contrary ends. We then argue that the objection, in this form, encompasses all cases of legal entrapment only if it is supplemented by appeal to the premise that law-enforcement agents have an absolute duty never to create crimes.</jats:p>

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Source info: Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 21:1, pp. 47-73
Uncontrolled Keywords:	contrariety of ends, entrapment, incoherence, integrity, irrationality, legal entrapment
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	21 Sep 2020 12:28
Last Modified:	18 Jan 2023 23:32
DOI:	10.26556/jesp.v22i1.1181
Related URLs:	Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3102052