Asymmetrical irrationality



McKenna, Robin
(2021) Asymmetrical irrationality. In: The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. Routledge, pp. 285-295. ISBN 9780367345907

[img] Text
Asymmetrical Irrationality FINAL.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (170kB) | Preview

Abstract

It is commonly observed that we live in an increasingly polarised world. Strikingly, we are polarised not only about political issues but also about scientific issues that have political implications such as climate change. This raises two questions. First, why are we so polarised over these issues? Second, does this mean our views about these issues are all equally ir/rational? In this chapter I explore both questions. Specifically, I draw on the literature on ideologically motivated reasoning to develop an answer to the first question. Put briefly, we exhibit “directional biases” in our information-processing: we try to assimilate new information into our existing webs of beliefs. This means that those who are predisposed to accept the case for climate change end up accepting it, whereas those who are predisposed to reject it end up rejecting it. Based on this answer, I then address the second question. I look at some reasons for thinking that, because we all exhibit such biases in our thinking, we are all equally rational (or, as the case may be, irrational). I also suggest some ways you might try reject these reasons.

Item Type: Book Section
Uncontrolled Keywords: 13 Climate Action
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 23 Oct 2020 09:19
Last Modified: 17 Mar 2024 10:23
DOI: 10.4324/9780429326769-34
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3104923