Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review

Elfeky, Adel, D'Aout, Kristiaan ORCID: 0000-0002-6043-7744, Lawson, Rebecca, Hepworth, Lauren R ORCID: 0000-0001-8542-9815, Thomas, Nicholas DA, Clynch, Abigail and Rowe, Fiona J ORCID: 0000-0001-9210-9131
(2021) Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 10 (1). 84-.

[img] Text
Elfeky et al (2021) Syst Rev.pdf - Published version

Download (918kB) | Preview


<h4>Background</h4>Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss following stroke.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review was conducted inclusive of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, before-after studies and case-controlled studies. Studies including adult and paediatric participants that investigated eye, head, or body movements in post-stroke visual field loss during visual exploration tasks were included. Search terms included a range of MESH terms as well as alternative terms relating to stroke, visual field loss, hemianopia, visual functions and scanning behaviour. Articles were selected by two authors independently. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. All included articles were assessed for risk of bias using checklists appropriate to the study design.<h4>Results</h4>Thirty-six articles (1123 participants) were included in the overall review (Kappa 0.863) and categorised into simulated or true visual field loss (typically hemianopia). Seven studies identified the biomechanical alterations to simulated hemianopia compared to normal performance. Twenty-nine studies detailed eye, head and body movement parameters in true hemianopia. Hemianopic participants and healthy adults with simulated hemianopia differed significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters as indicated by increased number and duration of fixations, number and duration of saccades and scan path length with shorter mean saccadic amplitude. Under simulated hemianopia, participants were consistently biased towards the sighted visual field while gaze behaviour in true hemianopia was biased in the direction of the blind hemifield.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is considerable evidence on the altered eye movements that occur in true hemianopia and in healthy adults with simulated hemianopia. Successful performance in naturalistic tasks of visual exploration appears to be related to compensatory mechanisms of visual exploratory behaviour, namely, an increase in the amplitude and peak velocity of saccades, widening horizontally the distribution of eye movements, and a shift of the overall distribution of saccades into the blind field. This review highlights the lack of studies reporting head and other body movement parameters in hemianopia. Further studies with robust methodology and large sample sizes involving participants with post-stroke visual field loss are needed.<h4>Systematic review registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42020194403.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Biomechanical, Movement, Hemianopia, Stroke, Visual field
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 29 Mar 2021 13:29
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 22:54
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4
Related URLs: