"<i>If You Don't See the Dog, What Can You Do?"</i> Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts



Owczarczak-Garstecka, Sara C, Christley, Robert M ORCID: 0000-0001-9250-3032, Watkins, Francine, Yang, Huadong ORCID: 0000-0002-8935-941X and Westgarth, Carri ORCID: 0000-0003-0471-2761
(2021) "<i>If You Don't See the Dog, What Can You Do?"</i> Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 18 (14). 7377-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.
[img] Text
ijerph-1237016 xml0907 (accepted version).docx - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Dog bites are a health risk in a number of workplaces such as the delivery, veterinary and dog rescue sectors. This study aimed to explore how workers negotiate the risk of dog bites in daily interactions with dogs and the role of procedures in workplace safety. Participants who encounter dogs at work were recruited using snowball sampling. Ethnographic methods (interviews, focus group discussions, participant-observations) were used for data collection. All data were coded qualitatively into themes. Six themes describing dog bite risk management were identified: 'Surveillance of dogs'; 'Communicating risk; 'Actions taken to manage perceived risk'; 'Reporting bites and near-misses', 'Investigating bites and near-misses', and; 'Learning and teaching safety'. While the procedures described dog bite risk as objective, when interacting with dogs, participants drew on experiential knowledge and subjective judgment of risk. There was a discrepancy between risks that the procedures aimed to guard against and the risk participants were experiencing in the course of work. This often led to disregarding procedures. Paradoxically, procedures generated risks to individual wellbeing and sometimes employment, by contributing to blaming employees for bites. Dog bite prevention could be improved by clarifying definitions of bites, involving at risk staff in procedure development, and avoiding blaming the victim for the incident.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: dog bites, interviews, risk management, safety procedures, qualitative methods, workplace safety
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Management
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 12 Jul 2021 07:35
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2023 23:25
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147377
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147377
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3129449