What should we believe when systematic reviews disagree?



Weeks, Andrew ORCID: 0000-0002-1909-337X
(2021) What should we believe when systematic reviews disagree? BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 128 (11). p. 1744. ISSN 1470-0328, 1471-0528

[thumbnail of BJOG accepted manuscript.pdf] Text
BJOG accepted manuscript.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (930kB) | Preview

Abstract

For many years, uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) has been used to treat severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), despite a lack of randomised trials to demonstrate its effectiveness. With commercial devices being expensive, clinicians in low resource settings have made their own using 2 low-cost, widely available items (Foley catheters and condoms). Public health experts have been so confident of their benefit that large programmes have been set up to disseminate the necessary skills worldwide.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 3215 Reproductive Medicine, 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 15 Jul 2021 08:20
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2024 23:01
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16818
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3129998