International Law of State Responsibility and COVID-19: An Ideology Critique



Knox, Robert ORCID: 0000-0002-1591-912X and Tzouvala, Ntina
(2021) International Law of State Responsibility and COVID-19: An Ideology Critique. The Australian Year Book of International Law Online, 39 (1). 105 - 121.

[img] Text
Knox and Tzouvala Covid and SR.docx - Accepted Version

Download (43kB)

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Despite minimal prospects of success, international lawyers spent the first few months of the global pandemic discussing whether the rules of state responsibility could be invoked against states, especially China, for their acts and omissions regarding <jats:sc>COVID</jats:sc>-19. In this piece, we take these debates seriously, if not necessarily literally. We argue that the unrealistic nature of these debates does not make them irrelevant. Rather, we propose an ideology critique of state responsibility as a legal field. Our approach is two-fold. First, we argue these debates need to be situated within the rise of geopolitical competition between the US and its allies on the one hand and China on the other. In this context, state responsibility is always laid at the feet of one’s opponents. Secondly, we posit that my emphasising the role of states, recourse to state responsibility renders invisible the role of transnational processes of capitalist production and exchange that have profound effects on nature and set the stage for the emergence and spread of infectious diseases. Drawing from the work of the geographer Neil Smith, we argue against the ‘naturalisation’ of disasters performed much of the international legal discourse about <jats:sc>COVID</jats:sc>-19.</jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law and Social Justice
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 02 Aug 2021 08:29
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2022 07:10
DOI: 10.1163/26660229-03901009
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3131732