Prospective validation of the 4C prognostic models for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol



Knight, SR, Gupta, RK ORCID: 0000-0002-6257-1285, Ho, A, Pius, R, Buchan, I ORCID: 0000-0003-3392-1650, Carson, G, Drake, TM, Dunning, J, Fairfield, CJ, Gamble, C ORCID: 0000-0002-3021-1955
et al (show 71 more authors) (2022) Prospective validation of the 4C prognostic models for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol Thorax, 77 (6). pp. 606-615. ISSN 0040-6376, 1468-3296

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

Purpose To prospectively validate two risk scores to predict mortality (4C Mortality) and in-hospital deterioration (4C Deterioration) among adults hospitalised with COVID-19. Methods Prospective observational cohort study of adults (age ≥18 years) with confirmed or highly suspected COVID-19 recruited into the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK (CCP-UK) study in 306 hospitals across England, Scotland and Wales. Patients were recruited between 27 August 2020 and 17 February 2021, with at least 4 weeks follow-up before final data extraction. The main outcome measures were discrimination and calibration of models for in-hospital deterioration (defined as any requirement of ventilatory support or critical care, or death) and mortality, incorporating predefined subgroups. Results 76 588 participants were included, of whom 27 352 (37.4%) deteriorated and 12 581 (17.4%) died. Both the 4C Mortality (0.78 (0.77 to 0.78)) and 4C Deterioration scores (pooled C-statistic 0.76 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.77)) demonstrated consistent discrimination across all nine National Health Service regions, with similar performance metrics to the original validation cohorts. Calibration remained stable (4C Mortality: pooled slope 1.09, pooled calibration-in-the-large 0.12; 4C Deterioration: 1.00, –0.04), with no need for temporal recalibration during the second UK pandemic wave of hospital admissions. Conclusion Both 4C risk stratification models demonstrate consistent performance to predict clinical deterioration and mortality in a large prospective second wave validation cohort of UK patients. Despite recent advances in the treatment and management of adults hospitalised with COVID-19, both scores can continue to inform clinical decision making.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ISARIC Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC4C) Investigators, ISARIC4C investigators, Humans, Prognosis, Hospital Mortality, Adolescent, Adult, World Health Organization, State Medicine, Observational Studies as Topic, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2
Divisions: Faculty of Health & Life Sciences
Faculty of Health & Life Sciences > Inst. Infection, Vet & Ecological Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 01 Dec 2021 09:18
Last Modified: 22 Jan 2026 10:35
DOI: 10.1136/THORAXJNL-2021-217629
Open Access URL: https://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2021/11/21/th...
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3144292
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.