Effect of Corneal Cross-linking versus Standard Care on Keratoconus Progression in Young Patients: The KERALINK Randomized Controlled Trial.



Larkin, Daniel FP, Chowdhury, Kashfia, Burr, Jennifer M, Raynor, Mathew, Edwards, Matthew, Tuft, Stephen J, Bunce, Catey ORCID: 0000-0002-0935-3713, Caverly, Emilia, Doré, Caroline and KERALINK Trial Study Group,
(2021) Effect of Corneal Cross-linking versus Standard Care on Keratoconus Progression in Young Patients: The KERALINK Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology, 128 (11). pp. 1516-1526.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Purpose</h4>To examine the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking (CXL) for stabilization of progressive keratoconus.<h4>Design</h4>Observer-masked, randomized, controlled, parallel-group superiority trial.<h4>Participants</h4>Sixty participants 10 to 16 years of age with progressive keratoconus, one eye of each deemed the study eye.<h4>Methods</h4>The study eye was randomized to either CXL plus standard care or standard care alone, with spectacle or contact lens correction as necessary for vision.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>The primary outcome was steep keratometry (K2) in the study eye as a measure of the steepness of the cornea at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included keratoconus progression defined as a 1.5-diopter (D) increase in K2, visual acuity, keratoconus apex corneal thickness, and quality of life.<h4>Results</h4>Of 60 participants, 30 were randomized to CXL and standard care groups. Of these, 30 patients in the CXL group and 28 patients in the standard care group were analyzed. Mean K2 in the study eye 18 months after randomization was 49.7 D (standard deviation [SD], 3.8 D) in the CXL group and 53.4 D (SD, 5.8 D) in the standard care group. The adjusted mean difference in K2 in the study eye was -3.0 D (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.9 to -1.1 D; P = 0.002), favoring CXL. Adjusted differences between groups in uncorrected and corrected vision favored eyes receiving CXL: -0.31 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.11 logMAR; P = 0.002) and -0.51 logMAR (95% CI, -1.37 to 0.35 logMAR; P = 0.002). Keratoconus progression in the study eye occurred in 2 patients (7%) randomized to CXL compared with 12 patients (43%) randomized to standard care. The unadjusted odds ratio suggests that on average, patients in the CXL arm had 90% (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.02-0.48; P = 0.004) lower odds of experiencing progression compared with those receiving standard care.<h4>Conclusions</h4>CXL arrests progression of keratoconus in the majority of young patients. CXL should be considered as a first-line treatment in progressive disease. If the arrest of keratoconus progression induced by CXL is sustained in longer follow-up, particular benefit may be derived from avoiding a later requirement for contact lens wear or corneal transplantation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: KERALINK Trial Study Group, Cornea, Humans, Keratoconus, Collagen, Riboflavin, Photosensitizing Agents, Cross-Linking Reagents, Corneal Topography, Refraction, Ocular, Treatment Outcome, Photochemotherapy, Follow-Up Studies, Prospective Studies, Ultraviolet Rays, Adolescent, Female, Male
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 23 Dec 2021 12:19
Last Modified: 03 Feb 2024 09:48
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.019
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.019
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3145959