Nightingale, Rebecca, Lewis, Joseph ORCID: 0000-0002-3837-5188, Monsell, Katelyn Rhiannon, Jones, Lewis, Smith, Christopher, Kundu, Shantanu, Bond, Helena, Burhan, Hassan, Fletcher, Tom, Blanchard, Thomas et al (show 6 more authors)
(2021)
CPAP delivered outside critical care during the second wave of COVID-19: outcomes from a UK respiratory surge unit.
BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 8 (1).
e000907-.
ISSN 2052-4439, 2052-4439
Text
CPAP delivered outside critical care during the second wave of COVID-19 outcomes from a UK respiratory surge unit.pdf - Published version Download (306kB) | Preview |
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>NHS England recommends non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a possible treatment for type 1 respiratory failure associated with COVID-19 pneumonitis, either to avoid intubation or as a ceiling of care. However, data assessing this strategy are sparse, especially for the use of CPAP as a ceiling of care, and particularly when delivered outside of a traditional critical care environment. We describe a cohort of patients from Liverpool, UK, who received CPAP on a dedicated respiratory surge unit at the start of the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in UK.<h4>Methods</h4>Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients receiving CPAP for the treatment of respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 on the respiratory surge unit at the Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, UK from 21 September until 30 November 2020.<h4>Results</h4>88 patients were included in the analysis. 56/88 (64%) were deemed suitable for escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and received CPAP as a trial; 32/88 (36%) received CPAP as a ceiling of care. Median age was 63 years (IQR: 56-74) and 58/88 (66%) were men. Median SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> immediately prior to CPAP initiation was 95 (92-152). Among patients for escalation to IMV, the median time on CPAP was 6 days (IQR 4-7) and survival at day 30 was 84% (47/56) with 14/56 (25%) escalated to IMV. Of those patients for whom CPAP was ceiling of care, the median duration of CPAP was 9 days (IQR 7-11) and 18/32 (56%) survived to day 30. Pulmonary barotrauma occurred in 9% of the cohort. There were no associations found on multivariant analysis that were associated with all-cause 30-day mortality.<h4>Conclusions</h4>With adequate planning and resource redistribution, CPAP may be delivered effectively outside of a traditional critical care setting for the treatment of respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Clinicians delivering CPAP to patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis should be alert to the dangers of pulmonary barotrauma. Among patients who are for escalation of care, the use of CPAP may avoid the need for IMV in some patients. Our data support the NHS England recommendation to consider CPAP as a ceiling of care.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans, Critical Care, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Pandemics, United Kingdom, COVID-19 |
Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jan 2022 15:23 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2024 18:50 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000907 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3146683 |