Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19–Free Surgical Pathways During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Comparative Cohort Study



Glasbey, James C and Bhangu, Aneel
(2021) Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19–Free Surgical Pathways During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Comparative Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 39 (1). JCO.20.01933-JCO.20.01933.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
jco.20.01933.pdf - Published Version
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
jco-39-66.pdf - Published version
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>PURPOSE</jats:title><jats:p> As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19–free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>PATIENTS AND METHODS</jats:title><jats:p> This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19–free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title><jats:p> Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19–free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19–free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score–matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSION</jats:title><jats:p> Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19–free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. </jats:p></jats:sec>

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVIDSurg Collaborative, Humans, Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications, Critical Care, Logistic Models, Cohort Studies, International Cooperation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Epidemics, Elective Surgical Procedures, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Clinical Directorate
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences > School of Medicine
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 Jul 2022 07:33
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 21:11
DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01933
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3149435

Available Versions of this Item