Thought Crime and the Treason Act 1351



Hill, Daniel J ORCID: 0000-0003-4546-8662 and Whistler, Daniel
(2022) Thought Crime and the Treason Act 1351. LIVERPOOL LAW REVIEW, 43 (3). pp. 517-537.

This is the latest version of this item.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.
[img] Text
Thought Crimes LLR v4.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript

Download (96kB)
[img] Text
Hill-Whistler2022_Article_ThoughtCrimeAndTheTreasonAct13.pdf - Published version

Download (609kB) | Preview

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Has there ever been a law criminalizing mental states in themselves? We show that there has been, and still is: the Treason Act 1351. We argue for what we call ‘the Mental Interpretation’ of the Act, over against the interpretation that it criminalizes a complex of a mental state and an ‘overt act’. We also provide authority for the stronger thesis that the overt act functions purely as evidence for the mental state. We discuss other laws in various jurisdictions that have historically criminalized mental states in themselves. We conclude by considering the objection that the European Convention on Human Rights rules out our interpretation.</jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Treason, Treason Act 1351, Mens rea, Actus reus, Criminal law, Thought crimes
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of the Arts
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 19 Apr 2022 14:59
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 21:04
DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09296-5
Open Access URL: https://rdcu.be/cLxBP
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3153370

Available Versions of this Item