Healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture: a scoping review

Scott, Bradley, Seyres, Martin, Philp, Fraser ORCID: 0000-0002-8552-7869, Chadwick, Edward K and Blana, Dimitra
(2022) Healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture: a scoping review. PEERJ, 10. e13517-.

[img] Text
peerj-13517.pdf - Published version

Download (287kB) | Preview


<h4>Background</h4>Single camera markerless motion capture has the potential to facilitate at home movement assessment due to the ease of setup, portability, and affordable cost of the technology. However, it is not clear what the current healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture are and what information is being collected that may be used to inform clinical decision making. This review aims to map the available literature to highlight potential use cases and identify the limitations of the technology for clinicians and researchers interested in the collection of movement data.<h4>Survey methodology</h4>Studies were collected up to 14 January 2022 using Pubmed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus using a systematic search. Data recorded included the description of the markerless system, clinical outcome measures, and biomechanical data mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework (ICF). Studies were grouped by patient population.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 50 studies were included for data collection. Use cases for single camera markerless motion capture technology were identified for Neurological Injury in Children and Adults; Hereditary/Genetic Neuromuscular Disorders; Frailty; and Orthopaedic or Musculoskeletal groups. Single camera markerless systems were found to perform well in studies involving single plane measurements, such as in the analysis of infant general movements or spatiotemporal parameters of gait, when evaluated against 3D marker-based systems and a variety of clinical outcome measures. However, they were less capable than marker-based systems in studies requiring the tracking of detailed 3D kinematics or fine movements such as finger tracking.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Single camera markerless motion capture offers great potential for extending the scope of movement analysis outside of laboratory settings in a practical way, but currently suffers from a lack of accuracy where detailed 3D kinematics are required for clinical decision making. Future work should therefore focus on improving tracking accuracy of movements that are out of plane relative to the camera orientation or affected by occlusion, such as supination and pronation of the forearm.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Markerless motion capture, Markerless, Single camera markerless motion capture, Scoping review, Single camera human motion analysis, Single camera movement analysis of humans, Clinical motion capture, Neurological injuries, Telerehabilitation, Musculoskeletal
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health > School of Health Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 26 May 2022 11:54
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 21:00
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13517
Related URLs: