Liothyronine for hypothyroidism: a candidate for disinvestment or in need of further research? A value of information analysis

Hughes, Dyfrig A ORCID: 0000-0001-8247-7459, Skiadas, Konstantinos, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Anderson, Pippa and Heald, Adrian
(2021) Liothyronine for hypothyroidism: a candidate for disinvestment or in need of further research? A value of information analysis. BMJ OPEN, 11 (12). e051702-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.


<h4>Objective</h4>Medicines with limited evidence of effectiveness are prime candidates for disinvestment. However, investment in further research may be preferable to deimplementation, given that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and research can inform formulary decisions. A case in point is liothyronine, which is sometimes prescribed to levothyroxine-treated patients who continue to experience hypothyroid symptoms. It is a putative low value medicine, associated with uncertainties in both clinical and cost-effectiveness. The aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of liothyronine in this context, and estimate the value of conducting further research.<h4>Design</h4>Cost utility and value of information analyses.<h4>Setting</h4>Primary care within the National Health Service in the UK.<h4>Participants</h4>Fifty-four levothyroxine-treated patients with persistent symptoms of hypothyroidism.<h4>Interventions</h4>Liothyronine plus levothyroxine versus levothyroxine alone.<h4>Primary and secondary outcome measures</h4>Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and the expected monetary value of sample information.<h4>Results</h4>20/54 (37%) of patients who responded to the survey reported severe problems in carrying out usual activities of everyday living and 12/54 (22%) reported severe anxiety or depression symptoms. Mean (SD) utility was 0.53 (0.23). The differences in expected total, 10-year costs and QALYs between a treatment strategy of liothyronine/levothyroxine combination therapy, and levothyroxine alone, was £12 053 and 1.014, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £11 881 per QALY gained was sensitive to the price of liothyronine. The probability of liothyronine/levothyroxine combination therapy being cost effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY was 0.56. The value of reducing uncertainty in the efficacy of treatment was £3.64 m per year in the UK.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A definitive clinical trial to confirm clinical effectiveness may be preferable to immediate disinvestment, and would be justified given the value of the information gained far exceeds the cost.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: health economics, quality in health care, statistics & research methods, therapeutics, thyroid disease
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2022 09:37
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 21:00
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051702
Open Access URL:
Related URLs: