Agenor, Pierre-Richard and Jackson, Timothy P ORCID: 0000-0002-6142-8882
(2022)
Monetary and macroprudential policy coordination with biased preferences.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 144.
p. 104519.
ISSN 0165-1889, 1879-1743
Text
Sub JEDC-D-21-00387 Complete paper.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper studies the extent to which biased policy preferences, motivated by narrow institutional mandates, affect the gains from coordination between monetary policy (which may respond to financial imbalances) and macroprudential regulation (in the form of capital requirements) in responding to financial stability considerations, and whether these mandates can be set optimally. Numerical experiments show that, depending on the degree of bias in policy preferences, coordination may not entail burden sharing (in the sense of one policymaker reacting more, and the other less, aggressively to financial stability concerns) and may not be Pareto improving relative to the Nash equilibrium—even though it may generate significant gains for the economy as a whole. The optimal institutional mandate, based on maximizing household welfare under coordination, internalizes the impact of the cost of each policymaker's own instrument use on policy decisions. As a result, there may be an inverse relationship between the degree of bias in preferences and the instrument manipulation cost.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy, monetary policy, Government Policy and Regulation |
Divisions: | Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Management |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2022 09:25 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2024 19:49 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104519 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3163991 |