EIA decision-making and administrative justice: the substance of just decisions

Alberts, RC, Retief, FP, Arts, J, Roos, C, Cilliers, DP and Fischer, TB ORCID: 0000-0003-1436-1221
(2022) EIA decision-making and administrative justice: the substance of just decisions. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 40 (4). pp. 296-304.

[img] Text
EIA and administrative justice Jan2022.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript
Access to this file is embargoed until 19 April 2023.

Download (333kB)


In this paper we aim at determining the link between EIA report substance and administratively just EIA decisions. In so doing, previous research based on 42 case studies from South Africa, which analysed whether they comprised administratively just decisions (i.e. that were lawful, procedurally fair and reasonable) were reviewed for the substance of the EIA reports on which the decisions were based. The research found that administratively just decisions can be achieved even with weak EIA report substance in areas such as: need and desirability, identifying alternatives, dealing with significance, and addressing mitigation measures. We thereby conclude that administrative justice may be a false safety net in ensuring more environmentally sustainable EIA outcomes if not supported and informed by good EIA report substance. We conclude by making recommendations to improve substance and thereby strengthening administrative justice in EIA.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Administrative justice, decisions, EIA, quality, substance
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 10 Oct 2022 09:09
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 20:40
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2066445
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3165210