Evaluating the impacts of tiered restrictions introduced in England in December 2020 on covid-19 hospitalisations: a synthetic control study

Zhang, Xingna ORCID: 0000-0002-8849-2112, Hungerford, Daniel ORCID: 0000-0002-9770-0163, Green, Mark, García-Fiñana, Marta ORCID: 0000-0003-4939-0575, Buchan, Iain ORCID: 0000-0003-3392-1650 and Barr, Ben ORCID: 0000-0002-4208-9475 (2024) Evaluating the impacts of tiered restrictions introduced in England in December 2020 on covid-19 hospitalisations: a synthetic control study [Preprint]

PDF main.pdf - Preprint version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Objectives</h4> To assess the impact of Tier 3 covid-19 restrictions implemented in December 2020 in England on covid-19 hospital admissions compared to Tier 2 restrictions, and its potential variations by neighbourhood deprivation levels and the prevalence of the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7). <h4>Design</h4> Observational study utilising a synthetic control approach. Comparison of changes in weekly hospitalisation rates in Tier 3 areas to a synthetic control group derived from Tier 2 areas. <h4>Setting</h4> England between 4 th October 2020 and 21 st February 2021. <h4>Participants</h4> 23 million people under Tier 3 restrictions, compared to a synthetic control group derived from 29 million people under Tier 2 restrictions. <h4>Interventions</h4> Implementation of Tier 3 covid-19 restrictions in designated areas on 7 th December 2020, with additional constraints on indoor and outdoor meetings and the hospitality sector compared to less stringent Tier 2 restrictions. <h4>Main Outcome Measures</h4> Weekly covid-19 related hospital admissions for neighbourhoods in England over a 12-week period following the interventions. <h4>Results</h4> The introduction of Tier 3 restrictions was associated with a 17% average reduction in hospital admissions compared to Tier 2 areas (95% CI 13% to 21%; 8158 (6286 to 9981) in total)). The effects were similar across different levels of neighbourhood deprivation and prevalence of the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Regionally targeted Tier 3 restrictions in England had a moderate but significant effect on reducing hospitalisations. The impact did not exacerbate socioeconomic inequalities during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that regionally targeted restrictions can be effective in managing infectious diseases. <h4>SUMMARY BOXES</h4> <h4>What is already known on this topic</h4> — Previous studies of localised non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) found that they could be effective in reducing covid-19 transmissions. — covid-19 hospitalisation was a key indicator of healthcare resource dynamics, encompassing supply, demand, burden, and allocation, during the pandemic. — There is a need for a detailed examination of the impact of specific localised restrictions in the UK, such as Tier 3 measures, on hospital admissions to inform targeted public health strategies. <h4>What this study adds</h4> — This study found that additional localised restrictions on outdoor gatherings and in the hospitality sector were effective in mitigating hospital admissions during the pandemic. <h4>How this study might affect research, practice or policy</h4> — This study provides evidence for future public health policies and preparedness strategies supporting the use of differential regional restrictions during pandemics.

Item Type:	Preprint
Uncontrolled Keywords:	4206 Public Health, 42 Health Sciences, Coronaviruses Disparities and At-Risk Populations, Health Disparities, Infectious Diseases, Coronaviruses, Clinical Research, Health Disparities and Racial or Ethnic Minority Health Research, Social Determinants of Health, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 3 Good Health and Well Being
Divisions:	Faculty of Health & Life Sciences Faculty of Health & Life Sciences > Inst. Population Health
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	04 Mar 2024 09:12
Last Modified:	28 Aug 2026 01:52
DOI:	10.1101/2024.02.28.24303487
Related Websites:	Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3179058
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.