Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: Systematic review and meta-analyses.



Mazuquin, Bruno ORCID: 0000-0003-1566-9551, Moffatt, Maria ORCID: 0000-0002-8385-7418, Gill, Peter ORCID: 0000-0003-3797-9980, Gill, Peter ORCID: 0000-0001-7772-4849, Selfe, James, Rees, Jonathan ORCID: 0000-0003-1818-5800, Drew, Steve and Littlewood, Chris ORCID: 0000-0002-7703-727X
(2021) Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: Systematic review and meta-analyses. PloS one, 16 (5). e0252137-. ISSN 1932-6203, 1932-6203

[thumbnail of Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair Systematic review and meta-analyses.pdf] PDF
Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair Systematic review and meta-analyses.pdf - Open Access published version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the effectiveness of early rehabilitation compared with delayed/standard rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair for pain, function, range of movement, strength, and repair integrity.<h4>Design</h4>Systematic review and meta-analyses.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched databases and included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early with delayed/standard rehabilitation for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery. We assessed risk of bias of the RCTs using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty RCTs, with 1841 patients, were included. The majority of the RCTs were of high or unclear risk of overall bias. We found substantial variations in the rehabilitation programmes, time in the sling and timing of exercise progression. We found no statistically significant differences for pain and function at any follow-up except for the outcome measure Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at six months (MD: 6.54; 95%CI: 2.24-10.84) in favour of early rehabilitation. We found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for shoulder flexion at six weeks (MD: 7.36; 95%CI: 2.66-12.06), three (MD: 8.45; 95%CI: 3.43-13.47) and six months (MD: 3.57; 95%CI: 0.81-6.32) and one year (MD: 1.42; 95%CI: 0.21-2.64) and similar differences for other planes of movement. In terms of repair integrity, early mobilisation does not seem to increase the risk of re-tears (OR:1.05; 95%CI: 0.64-1.75).<h4>Discussion</h4>Current approaches to early mobilisation, based largely on early introduction of passive movement, did not demonstrate significant differences in most clinical outcomes, although we found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for range of movement. Importantly, there were no differences in repair integrity between early and delayed/standard rehabilitation. Most rehabilitation programmes did not consider early active movement as soon as the patient feels able. With ongoing variation in rehabilitation protocols there remains a need for large high quality RCT to inform the optimal approach to rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Rotator Cuff, Animals, Humans, Range of Motion, Articular, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Rotator Cuff Injuries
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health > School of Health Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 21 May 2024 08:35
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2024 14:17
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252137
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3181794