A retrospective propensity-score-matched cohort study of the impact of procalcitonin testing on antibiotic use in hospitalized patients during the first wave of COVID-19.


Sandoe, Jonathan AT, Grozeva, Detelina, Albur, Mahableshwar, Bond, Stuart E, Brookes-Howell, Lucy, Dark, Paul, Euden, Joanne, Hamilton, Ryan, Hellyer, Thomas P, Henley, Josie et al (show 21 more authors) (2024) A retrospective propensity-score-matched cohort study of the impact of procalcitonin testing on antibiotic use in hospitalized patients during the first wave of COVID-19. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 79 (11). dkae246-dkae246. ISSN 0305-7453, 1460-2091

[thumbnail of PEACH_WP2_1_paper_final_revised-7-5-24.docx] Microsoft Word (OpenXML)
PEACH_WP2_1_paper_final_revised-7-5-24.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript
Download (483kB)

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Procalcitonin (PCT) is a blood marker used to help diagnose bacterial infections and guide antibiotic treatment. PCT testing was widely used/adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.<h4>Objectives</h4>Primary: to measure the difference in length of early (during first 7 days) antibiotic prescribing between patients with COVID-19 who did/did not have baseline PCT testing during the first wave of the pandemic. Secondary: to measure differences in length of hospital/ICU stay, mortality, total days of antibiotic prescribing and resistant bacterial infections between these groups.<h4>Methods</h4>Multi-centre, retrospective, observational, cohort study using patient-level clinical data from acute hospital Trusts/Health Boards in England/Wales. Inclusion: patients ≥16 years, admitted to participating Trusts/Health Boards and with a confirmed positive COVID-19 test between 1 February 2020 and 30 June 2020.<h4>Results</h4>Data from 5960 patients were analysed: 1548 (26.0%) had a baseline PCT test and 4412 (74.0%) did not. Using propensity-score matching, baseline PCT testing was associated with an average reduction in early antibiotic prescribing of 0.43 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.64 days, P < 0.001) and of 0.72 days (95% CI: 0.06-1.38 days, P = 0.03] in total antibiotic prescribing. Baseline PCT testing was not associated with increased mortality or hospital/ICU length of stay or with the rate of antimicrobial-resistant secondary bacterial infections.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Baseline PCT testing appears to have been an effective antimicrobial stewardship tool early in the pandemic: it reduced antibiotic prescribing without evidence of harm. Our study highlights the need for embedded, rapid evaluations of infection diagnostics in the National Health Service so that even in challenging circumstances, introduction into clinical practice is supported by evidence for clinical utility.<h4>Study registration number</h4>ISRCTN66682918.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: PEACH Study Group
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2024 07:14
Last Modified: 28 Feb 2026 20:49
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae246
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3184432
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.
Altmetric
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)