The Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in Community Wellbeing Research: Deliberative Method and the Lens of ‘Pragmatic Complexity’

Passey, Andrew, South, Jane, Southby, Kris, Gamsu, Mark, Bagnall, Anne-Marie, Pennington, Andy ORCID: 0000-0002-3455-8825 and Corcoran, Rhiannon ORCID: 0000-0001-8900-9199 (2024) The Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in Community Wellbeing Research: Deliberative Method and the Lens of ‘Pragmatic Complexity’ International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7 (3). pp. 427-446. ISSN 2524-5295, 2524-5309

Text Passey et al. (2024).pdf - Open Access published version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

AbstractGrowing policymaker interest in community wellbeing puts a premium on knowledge about existing community-level challenges and possible policy responses. If evidence-based policy and practice is foregrounded in these developments, there is a risk that lived experience is seen to lack validity in policy-making decisions and that knowledge from and about underrepresented groups is underemphasised. In consequence, the best available evidence on which to make policy decisions affecting these groups might be missed, thus potentially increasing health inequalities. This paper extends debate on this dilemma in this journal by using the lens of ‘pragmatic complexity’ as an alternative view on what works as evidence for policy and practice in community wellbeing. We present an empirical analysis of two expert hearings about community wellbeing. The events used a deliberative approach, allowing participants to probe evidence and consider from multiple perspectives ideas of how to address identified issues. Two overarching themes from the hearings - a perceived gap between the rhetoric and reality of wellbeing evidence, and proposals on ‘what works’ in the (co)-production of knowledge about wellbeing – are articulated and explored. We develop specific features emerging from the hearings that have wider resonance for community wellbeing research and suggest potential responses: what counts as ‘good’ or good-enough evidence about community wellbeing; system responses requiring thinking and engaging with complexity; reflections on the collective and collaborative process of an expert hearing approach. The combination of analysis of knowledge generated deliberatively through an expert hearing approach and a pragmatic complexity lens, delimits our contribution.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	4404 Development Studies, 44 Human Society, Generic health relevance, 10 Reduced Inequalities, 4 Quality Education
Divisions:	Faculty of Health & Life Sciences Faculty of Health & Life Sciences > Inst. Population Health
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	24 Sep 2024 09:33
Last Modified:	30 Dec 2025 23:46
DOI:	10.1007/s42413-024-00216-1
Related Websites:	Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3184716
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.