Using civil claim enquiry data to understand the context and impact of dog-related injuries in England and Wales between 2017 and 2024

Tulloch, John ORCID: 0000-0003-2150-0090, Ahearne, Gemma ORCID: 0000-0003-2421-1227, Moxey-Butler, Jasmine and McNally, James (2026) Using civil claim enquiry data to understand the context and impact of dog-related injuries in England and Wales between 2017 and 2024 [Poster]

PDF SCAS poster - dog bites final (1).pdf - Published version Download (299kB) | Preview

Description

Background Dog-related injuries, particularly bites, are a growing public health concern, yet context for effective prevention remains limited. This study takes a novel approach by analysing civil claims enquiry data to describe the context and impact of dog bite and non-bite incidents in England and Wales. Methods Descriptive analysis of anonymised civil claims enquiry data from 2017 to 2024. Demographic and injury consequences were compared between bite and non-bite incidents using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results 816 incidents were analysed; 91.3% were dog bites, 6.7% dog strikes. Bites (n=745) occurred at private residential properties (52.8%) or on public highways or pavements (22.8%). Non-bite incidents (n=70) were in public spaces (48.6%) or public highways or pavements (25.7%). Delivery workers accounted for 28.1% of victims. Most dogs were off lead at the time of injury (78.8% bites, 85.7% non-bites). Fractures occurred in 72.7% (40/55) of non-bite incidents. Mental illness followed in 15.1% of bite cases and 10.0% of non-bites; 6.5% of individuals were clinically diagnosed with specific phobias, 4.1% with post-traumatic stress disorder. Work absence was reported in 59.5% of bites, while 54.3% reported lost earnings. Discussion Civil claims data offer valuable insights into the burden and context of dog-related injuries. Dog strikes, although less common, often result in severe injury. Most public incidents involved unrestrained dogs. This work provides emerging evidence of the psychological impact of dog-related injuries. Conclusions We present a novel methodology for contextual injury research and highlight the need to assess enforceable dog lead use on highways and public spaces.

Item Type:	Poster
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Outcome of Injury, Animal bites, Mental Health, Legislation, Descriptive Epidemiology, Community
Divisions:	Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > School of Law and Social Justice
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	21 Oct 2024 08:33
Last Modified:	16 Jun 2026 20:02
DOI:	10.1136/ip-2025-045863
Related Websites:	Author
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3185231
Disclaimer:	The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.