Understanding the liminal situation of lone‐parent and blended families—A review and agenda for work–family research



Schaefer, Anneke, Gatrell, Caroline ORCID: 0000-0003-3134-3252 and Radcliffe, Laura ORCID: 0000-0002-7801-1995
(2025) Understanding the liminal situation of lone‐parent and blended families—A review and agenda for work–family research International Journal of Management Reviews, 27 (2). pp. 196-220. ISSN 1460-8545, 1468-2370

[thumbnail of A review and agenda for work-family research review - published.docx] Text
A review and agenda for work-family research review - published.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (330kB)

Abstract

AbstractThis review takes a transdisciplinary approach to work–family (WF) research, offering new perspectives on different family forms in the context of employment. It focuses on lone‐parents and blended families, highlighting how management research on the WF interface has been constrained by traditional definitions of ‘family’, assuming intact couple relationships. The review shows that the WF experiences of lone‐parents and blended families differ significantly from those of traditional or nuclear families. Our findings demonstrate that blended and lone‐parent families struggle with conventional WF policies based on traditional family forms. These families face four main challenges: (1) complex residential arrangements and relationships with co‐parents; (2) managing (limited) resources; (3) navigating stigma; and (4) narrow cultural scripts defining family roles. Utilizing cross‐domain identity transition theory, we question the traditional ideas at the core of current WF theory. We demonstrate that non‐traditional families occupy a ‘liminal’ WF space due to their more fluid parental, occupational and household identities compared to traditional families. We urge employers and policy makers to recognize and address the distinct WF challenges faced by lone‐parents and blended families. Employers should develop flexible working policies that accommodate complex residential arrangements and provide resources to support lone and blended family structures. Policy makers should consider revising family leave policies to be more inclusive of diverse family forms. Future research should further explore the diverse experiences of employed parents, including those from LGBTQIA+ communities, using our framework, which encourages researchers to think differently regarding existing WF theories through the consideration of our four themes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 3505 Human Resources and Industrial Relations, 35 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services, Generic health relevance, 4 Quality Education
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences
Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > School of Management
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2024 08:12
Last Modified: 16 Jun 2026 17:16
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12388
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3189039
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.