First opinion practice electronic health records are a useful source of descriptions of medication errors



Petrou, Eirini, Davies, Heather, Aoun, Maria, Radford, Alan D ORCID: 0000-0002-4590-1334, Singleton, David, Noble, Peter-John M and Killick, David R ORCID: 0000-0002-8787-7651
(2025) First opinion practice electronic health records are a useful source of descriptions of medication errors FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 12. 1560652-. ISSN 2297-1769, 2297-1769

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

Background: Medication error (MedE) is a leading global cause of harm in human healthcare with significance both in patient morbidity and mortality, and consequent legal and financial issues. Despite this, MedEs are a poorly explored area in veterinary medicine. Research has so far focussed on survey work and errors spontaneously reported to third parties, such as professional indemnity providers. Aim: Determine if MedEs can be successfully identified in first opinion electronic health records (EHRs). Animals: EHRs pertaining to animals treated in UK first opinion practice. Materials and methods: Regular expressions (REGEX) were designed (with assistance from a domain expert) to identify explicit reference to MedEs in the SAVSNET EHR dataset. Identified MedEs were then classified by the linear sequence of medication therapy, the degree of harm caused, the role of the person who made the error, and the medication type involved. Results: In total, 6,665 EHRs were identified by the REGEX, of which a random 2,847 were manually reviewed, with 1,023 (35.9%) matching the MedEs case definition. Of these MedEs, 29.5% (n = 302) caused mild harm to the patient, 2.8% (n = 27) moderate harm and 0.2% (n = 2) severe harm. MedEs were most frequent during the “drug administered” phase (51.4%) and within this phase, “dosing errors” were most common (68.1%). The most common medication types, associated with “drug administered” phase MedEs were vaccinations (27.1%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (19.0%). Conclusion: EHRs are a useful source of data on MedEs. MedEs are a common cause of patient harm in veterinary practice. The data provided here highlights drug classes at higher risk of problems for which mitigating action and/or education interventions are indicated.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adverse event, veterinary medicine, informatics, REGEX, general practice, patient safety, medical errors, pharmacovigilance
Divisions: Faculty of Health & Life Sciences
Faculty of Health & Life Sciences > Inst. Infection, Vet & Ecological Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 30 May 2025 14:38
Last Modified: 23 May 2026 10:16
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1560652
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1560652
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3193005
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.