Women's psychological experiences of preterm labour and birth which results in an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death: an empty systematic review



Worrall, Semra ORCID: 0000-0002-6587-9306, Payne, Elana ORCID: 0009-0001-6214-6641, Fellows, Rebecca E, Pike, Olivia, Carlisle, Naomi H, Carter, Jenny, Wittkowski, Anja, Burgess, Karen, Storey, Claire, Magee, Laura A
et al (show 5 more authors) (2025) Women's psychological experiences of preterm labour and birth which results in an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death: an empty systematic review FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 16 (154448). 1544485-. ISSN 1664-0640, 1664-0640

[thumbnail of Worrall, Payne, Fellows, [...], Khalil, & Silverio (2025) - Preterm Birth & Perinatal Bereavement Empty SR - Frontiers in Psychiatry.pdf] PDF
Worrall, Payne, Fellows, [...], Khalil, & Silverio (2025) - Preterm Birth & Perinatal Bereavement Empty SR - Frontiers in Psychiatry.pdf - Open Access published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly three quarters of stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur in infants born prematurely. The mothers of these children may be at increased risk of developing mental health difficulties as a result of their premature labour and/or subsequent loss. Methods: This systematic review was conducted to understand the psychological experiences of mothers who gave birth prematurely to a baby who subsequently dies as a result of an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death. Ten databases were searched. Any studies which included women who had suffered a perinatal bereavement as a result of preterm labour and birth, in any country, and in any language were eligible to be included. Studies focusing on antepartum stillbirth or in utero death were excluded due to not having the element of preterm labour and/or birth within the studies. Risk of bias was to be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Results: Following the screening of citations, no studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of studies were excluded due to a lack of distinction in terms of intrapartum or antepartum stillbirth, or grouping of types of perinatal loss. Had the inclusion criteria been less stringent and the three most common reasons for exclusion been removed, 19 studies would have been eligible for inclusion in the review, and we present a brief summary of these findings. Discussion: These review findings highlight the need for more research into the psychological experiences of mothers of preterm infants whose baby subsequently dies, whereby future studies should consider routine reporting of gestational age. To address the identified gaps, future research should consider alternative methods or broader inclusion criteria to capture relevant data. Emphasising the importance of reporting gestational age and distinguishing between types of perinatal loss will enhance the specificity of research findings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: preterm birth, neonatal death, intrapartum stillbirth, gestational age, perinatal mental health, empty systematic review
Divisions: Faculty of Health & Life Sciences
Faculty of Health & Life Sciences > Inst. Population Health
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2025 07:13
Last Modified: 16 Jun 2026 16:42
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544485
Related Websites:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3193106
Disclaimer: The University of Liverpool is not responsible for content contained on other websites from links within repository metadata. Please contact us if you notice anything that appears incorrect or inappropriate.