Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help



Ambridge, Ben ORCID: 0000-0003-2389-8477, Pine, Julian M ORCID: 0000-0002-7077-9713 and Lieven, Elena VM
(2014) Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help. LANGUAGE, 90 (3). E53-E90.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
LanguageUG.docx - Unspecified

Download (320kB)

Abstract

<jats:p xml:lang="en">In many different domains of language acquisition, there exists an apparent learnability problem to which innate knowledge of some aspect of universal grammar (UG) has been proposed as a solution. The present article reviews these proposals in the core domains of (i) identifying syntactic categories, (ii) acquiring basic morphosyntax, (iii) structure dependence, (iv) subjacency, and (v) the binding principles. We conclude that, in each of these domains, the innate UG-specified knowledge posited does not, in fact, simplify the task facing the learner.</jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: binding principles, child language acquisition, frequent frames, parameter setting, prosodic bootstrapping, semantic bootstrapping, structure dependence, subjacency, syntax, morphosyntax, universal grammar
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 05 Feb 2015 16:36
Last Modified: 22 Jan 2024 09:07
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0051
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/2002246

Available Versions of this Item

  • Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help. (deposited 05 Feb 2015 16:36) [Currently Displayed]