Thinking Differently about ‘False Allegations’ in Cases of Rape: The Search for Truth



Wheatcroft, Jacqueline M ORCID: 0000-0001-7212-1598 and Walklate, Sandra ORCID: 0000-0002-1628-9713
(2014) Thinking Differently about ‘False Allegations’ in Cases of Rape: The Search for Truth. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3 (1). pp. 239-248.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
1929-4409.2014.03.20 - Unspecified
Access to this file is embargoed until Unspecified.

Download (49kB)
[img] Text
IJCSV3A20-Wheatcroft.pdf - Unspecified

Download (672kB)

Abstract

<jats:p>The myth ‘cry wolf’ continues to pose particular problems for campaigners, policy makers and practitioners. This paper subjects this myth, and the way in which it has been debated, to critical scrutiny with a view to suggesting an alternative and better way of challenging the presumption both in theory and in practice that women ‘cry wolf’. In reflecting on lessons learned that presume believability in establishing rapport from the treatment of children in sexual offence cases the paper suggests that such practices can maximise efficacy in the treatment of women in cases of rape. It concludes that by leaving accusatory language behind, complainants, practitioners and judicial parties may experience more successful pathways to truth.</jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ## TULIP Type: Articles/Papers (Journal) ##
Subjects: ?? BF ??
?? HM ??
?? KD ??
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 21 Jan 2015 11:13
Last Modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:55
DOI: 10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.20
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/2002924

Available Versions of this Item

  • Thinking Differently about ‘False Allegations’ in Cases of Rape: The Search for Truth. (deposited 21 Jan 2015 11:13) [Currently Displayed]