The effect of induced fusional demand on static and dynamic stereoacuity thresholds: the digital Synoptophore.



Tidbury, Laurence P, O'Connor, Anna R ORCID: 0000-0002-0376-9670 and Wuerger, Sophie M ORCID: 0000-0003-0080-5813
(2019) The effect of induced fusional demand on static and dynamic stereoacuity thresholds: the digital Synoptophore. BMC ophthalmology, 19 (1). p. 6.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS:The ability to extract depth from disparity may be hindered under fusional stress, as alignment of the eyes may be more difficult to maintain consistently. Therefore we aim to determine the effect of fusional demand on stereoacuity in individuals with no known binocular vision impairments. METHODS:A novel static and dynamic binocular depth detection task, capable of assessing many discrete levels of stereoacuity, was presented on digital displays attached to each tube of the Synoptophore. Stereoacuity was measured with any latent deviation fully corrected and compared to that measured at the 'recovery' angle. This recovery angle is where single vision is restored after decompensation to diplopia, during vergence range assessment. RESULTS:Seventy-two subjects (50 Female, 22 Male; mean (SD) age 22 (6) years) were assessed. The amount of fusional demand was between 1 and 26 prism dioptres (PD), with a mean (SD) of 8(6)PD. Under zero fusion demand the mean (SD) static and dynamic depth detection thresholds were 322(53)" and 69(23)". Under fusional stress these were 224(40)" and 77(21)". There was no significant difference between thresholds in stressed and zero demand fusion (p = 0.08). Dynamic depth detection thresholds were significantly lower than static (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION:Fusional stress does not appear to impact on stereoacuity. The numerical value of the recovery point varied amongst individuals, but this represents a common point, where single vision is easily restored and binocularity well established. Due to individual differences in the ability to control a certain amount of fusional stress (e.g. vergences stress of 10PD, when recovery is 8PD, will perturb binocularity more than a person with a recovery of 20PD), previous reports may not accurately represent the effect of fusional stress. Whilst our findings are contrary to previous reports, we did not stress fusion beyond the recovery point and used a more accurate/repeatable method to measure stereoacuity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Fusion, Stereoacuity, Vergence, Fusion-range, Binocular vision, Synoptophore
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 18 Jan 2019 09:49
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2023 01:06
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-1000-2
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-1000-2
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3031434