European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population.



Nielsen, Jens Cosedis, Lin, Yenn-Jiang, de Oliveira Figueiredo, Marcio Jansen, Sepehri Shamloo, Alireza, Alfie, Alberto, Boveda, Serge, Dagres, Nikolaos, Di Toro, Dario, Eckhardt, Lee L, Ellenbogen, Kenneth
et al (show 41 more authors) (2020) European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population. Journal of Arrhythmia, 36 (4). pp. 553-607.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.
[img] Text
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)Latin American He.pdf - Published version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

In clinical practice and for scientific purposes, cardiologists and primary care physicians perform risk assessment in patients with cardiac diseases or conditions with high risk of developing such. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) set down this expert consensus statement task force to summarize the consensus regarding risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias. Objectives were to raise awareness of using the right risk assessment tool for a given outcome in a given population, and to provide physicians with practical proposals that may lead to rational and evidence-based risk assessment and improvement of patient care in this regard. A large variety of methods are used for risk assessment and choosing the best methods and tools hereof in a given situation is not simple. Even though parameters and test results found associated with increased risk of one outcome (e.g. death) may also be associated with higher risk of other adverse outcomes, specific risk assessment strategies should be used only for the purposes for which they are validated. The work of this task force is summarized in a row of consensus statement tables.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Cardiovascular, 3 Good Health and Well Being, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Asia, Consensus, Humans, Latin America, Risk Assessment
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 10 Sep 2020 14:33
Last Modified: 17 Mar 2024 08:48
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12338
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12338
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3100696