Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial

Quirke, Fiona A, Healy, Patricia, Bhraonain, Elaine Ni, Daly, Mandy, Biesty, Linda, Hurley, Tim, Walker, Karen, Meher, Shireen, Haas, David M, Bloomfield, Frank H
et al (show 3 more authors) (2021) Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial. TRIALS, 22 (1). 142-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.


<h4>Background</h4>The Delphi method is used in a wide variety of settings as a method of building consensus on important issues. Traditionally, the Delphi method uses multiple rounds of a survey to allow for feedback of other participants' survey responses in between rounds. By informing participants about how others answer a question or prioritise specific topics, it allows for diverse opinions to inform the consensus process. For this reason, the Delphi method is popular as a consensus building approach in developing core outcome sets (COS), i.e. the minimum agreed set of standardised outcomes that should be measured and reported in studies on a specific health condition. In a COS setting, participants prioritise the importance of outcomes for inclusion in a COS. This usually involves participating in multiple rounds of a survey that can span several weeks or months. Challenges with participant retention have been highlighted in previous COS. We will compare a three-round with a Real-Time Delphi approach on prioritised outcomes. This trial is embedded within the COHESION study which is developing a COS for interventions treating neonatal encephalopathy.<h4>Methods</h4>One hundred and eighty stakeholders (parents/caregivers of infants diagnosed and treated with neonatal encephalopathy, healthcare providers and researchers) will be randomised using stratified randomisation to take part in either the Multi-Round or Real-Time Delphi. Stakeholders will rate the importance of the same set of outcomes in both arms. We will compare the prioritised outcomes at the end of both surveys as well as other parameters such as feedback, initial condition and iteration effects.<h4>Discussion</h4>This trial will provide evidence to inform decisions on the use of Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi survey methods.<h4>Trial registration</h4>NCT04471103 . Registered on 14 July 2020.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Real-Time Delphi, Multi-Round Delphi, Core outcome sets, Methodology, Randomised trial
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 19 Jul 2021 10:42
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 21:35
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05074-2
Open Access URL:
Related URLs: