Comparison of two T-cell assays to evaluate T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination in naive and convalescent healthcare workers



Phillips, Eloise, Adele, Sandra, Malone, Tom, Deeks, Alexandra, Stafford, Lizzie, Dobson, Susan L, Amini, Ali, Skelly, Donal, Eyre, David, Jeffery, Katie
et al (show 8 more authors) (2022) Comparison of two T-cell assays to evaluate T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination in naive and convalescent healthcare workers. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, 209 (1). pp. 90-98.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 following infection and vaccination are less characterized than antibody responses, due to a more complex experimental pathway. We measured T-cell responses in 108 healthcare workers (HCWs) using the commercialized Oxford Immunotec T-SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 assay service (OI T-SPOT) and the PITCH ELISpot protocol established for academic research settings. Both assays detected T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike, membrane, and nucleocapsid proteins. Responses were significantly lower when reported by OI T-SPOT than by PITCH ELISpot. Four weeks after two doses of either Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 AZD1222 vaccine, the responder rate was 63% for OI T-SPOT Panels 1 + 2 (peptides representing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein excluding regions present in seasonal coronaviruses), 69% for OI T-SPOT Panel 14 (peptides representing the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike), and 94% for the PITCH ELISpot total spike. The two OI T-SPOT panels correlated strongly with each other showing that either readout quantifies spike-specific T-cell responses, although the correlation between the OI T-SPOT panels and the PITCH ELISpot total spike was moderate. The standardization, relative scalability, and longer interval between blood acquisition and processing are advantages of the commercial OI T-SPOT assay. However, the OI T-SPOT assay measures T-cell responses at a significantly lower magnitude compared to the PITCH ELISpot assay, detecting T-cell responses in a lower proportion of vaccinees. This has implications for the reporting of low-level T-cell responses that may be observed in patient populations and for the assessment of T-cell durability after vaccination.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: T cell, SARS-CoV-2, vaccination, infection, virus
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2022 10:33
Last Modified: 09 Feb 2023 02:44
DOI: 10.1093/cei/uxac042
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cei/uxac042
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3165338