 | Up a level |
Mundle, Shuchita, Bracken, Hillary, Khedikar, Vaishali, Mulik, Jayashree, Faragher, Brian, Easterling, Thomas, Leigh, Simon, Granby, Paul, Haycox, Alan 
ORCID: 0000-0001-6659-4866, Turner, Mark A ORCID: 0000-0002-5299-8656 et al (show 3 more authors)
(2017)
Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
LANCET, 390 (10095).
pp. 669-680.
Mundle, Shuchita, Bracken, Hillary, Khedikar, Vaishali, Mulik, Jayashree, Faragher, Brian, Easterling, Thomas, Leigh, Simon, Granby, Paul, Haycox, Alan ORCID: 0000-0001-6659-4866, Turner, Mark A ORCID: 0000-0002-5299-8656 et al (show 5 more authors)
(2021)
The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
BMC research notes, 14 (1).
p. 355.
Bracken, Hillary, Lightly, Kate, Mundle, Shuchita, Kerr, Robbie, Faragher, Brian, Easterling, Thomas, Leigh, Simon, Turner, Mark ORCID: 0000-0002-5299-8656, Alfirevic, Zarko, Winikoff, Beverly et al (show 1 more authors)
(2021)
Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 21 (1).
537-.