Knowledge, attitudes and perspective on adverse drug reaction reporting in a public sector hospital in South Africa: baseline analysis.

Terblanche, Antionette, Meyer, Johanna Catharina ORCID: 0000-0003-0462-5713, Godman, Brian ORCID: 0000-0001-6539-6972 and Summers, Robert Stanley (2017) Knowledge, attitudes and perspective on adverse drug reaction reporting in a public sector hospital in South Africa: baseline analysis. Hospital practice (1995), 45 (5). pp. 238-245.

Text Accepted for publication - Terblanche et al.docx - Author Accepted Manuscript Download (137kB)

Abstract

<h4>Objective</h4>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can cause significant harm in patients; however, ADRs are under-reported in many countries, including South Africa, where evidence of a pharmacovigilance (PV) system to monitor and manage ADRs is a requirement for compliance with norms and standards for quality healthcare delivery. We conducted an analysis amongst health care professionals (HCPs) at Sebokeng Hospital to assess the situation there and make recommendations.<h4>Methods</h4>Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire, targeting all medical practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and pharmacist assistants in the hospital. Current procedures for reporting of ADRs were documented. Records were reviewed to determine the number of ADR reports submitted for the 18-month period prior to the study. Data were analysed with SAS. Ethical clearance was obtained.<h4>Results</h4>The questionnaire was completed by 132 HCPs (nurses: 58.3%; medical practitioners: 23.5%; pharmacist assistants: 11.4%; pharmacists: 6.8%). The vast majority indicated ADR reporting is necessary (96.2%) and their professional obligation (89.4%). Only 18.9% were aware of an existing PV system in the hospital, 15.2% had an ADR form available and 18.9% knew to whom the form should be submitted. The vast majority had never reported an ADR, had never received training in PV, but wanted training on ADR reporting. Factors discouraging ADR reporting included not knowing how to report them (53.8%), lack of time (37.1%), additional work load (22.0%), uncertainty about the outcome of reporting (32.6%), and lack of confidence to discuss ADRs with colleagues (22.0%). Only 2.3% knew how many ADRs were reported, that ADRs are discussed by a committee (6.1%) and that internal feedback is received on reported ADRs (6.1%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>There is an extensive need in Sebokeng Hospital for training on ADR reporting and implementation of systems to facilitate relevant processes; a need which may also exist in other public hospitals in South Africa.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Humans, Attitude of Health Personnel, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Public Sector, Adult, Middle Aged, Personnel, Hospital, Quality of Health Care, South Africa, Female, Male, Pharmacovigilance, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	03 Oct 2017 09:52
Last Modified:	19 Jan 2023 06:53
DOI:	10.1080/21548331.2017.1381013
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3009742