Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks

Bench-Capon, TJM ORCID: 0000-0003-3975-4398 (2016) Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 26 (4). pp. 1055-1064.

Text
TBCLoopsFinal.pdf - Author Accepted Manuscript
Download (164kB)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu011

Abstract

In this article, I offer an interpretation of cycles in Dung-style argumentation frameworks in which even length cycles are treated as dilemmas and odd length cycles as paradoxes. The different properties of cycles with different parities arising from the use of preferred semantics are argued to be coherent with this interpretation.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Argumentation, preferred semantics, cycles, paradoxes, dilemmas
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	27 Oct 2016 10:44
Last Modified:	17 May 2023 09:24
DOI:	10.1093/logcom/exu011
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3004007