Lewis, Gemma, Duffy, Larisa, Ades, Anthony, Amos, Rebekah 
ORCID: 0000-0002-0870-6847, Araya, Ricardo, Brabyn, Sally, Button, Katherine S, Churchill, Rachel, Derrick, Catherine, Dowrick, Christopher et al (show 18 more authors)
(2019)
The clinical effectiveness of sertraline in primary care and the role of depression severity and duration ( PANDA): a pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.
The Lancet Psychiatry, 6 (11).
pp. 903-914.
Abstract
Background Depression is usually managed in primary care, but most antidepressant trials are of patients from secondary care mental health services, with eligibility criteria based on diagnosis and severity of depressive symptoms. Antidepressants are now used in a much wider group of people than in previous regulatory trials. We investigated the clinical effectiveness of sertraline in patients in primary care with depressive symptoms ranging from mild to severe and tested the role of severity and duration in treatment response. Methods The PANDA study was a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of patients from 179 primary care surgeries in four UK cities (Bristol, Liverpool, London, and York). We included patients aged 18 to 74 years who had depressive symptoms of any severity or duration in the past 2 years, where there was clinical uncertainty about the benefit of an antidepressant. This strategy was designed to improve the generalisability of our sample to current use of antidepressants within primary care. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a remote computer-generated code to sertraline or placebo, and were stratified by severity, duration, and site with random block length. Patients received one capsule (sertraline 50 mg or placebo orally) daily for one week then two capsules daily for up to 11 weeks, consistent with evidence on optimal dosages for efficacy and acceptability. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms 6 weeks after randomisation, measured by Patient Health Questionnaire, 9-item version (PHQ-9) scores. Secondary outcomes at 2, 6 and 12 weeks were depressive symptoms and remission (PHQ-9 and Beck Depression Inventory-II), generalised anxiety symptoms (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment 7-item version), mental and physical health-related quality of life (12-item Short-Form Health Survey), and self-reported improvement. All analyses compared groups as randomised (intention-to-treat). The study is registered with EudraCT, 2013-003440-22 (protocol number 13/0413; version 6.1) and ISRCTN, ISRCTN84544741, and is closed to new participants. Findings Between Jan 1, 2015, and Aug 31, 2017, we recruited and randomly assigned 655 patients—326 (50%) to sertraline and 329 (50%) to placebo. Two patients in the sertraline group did not complete a substantial proportion of the baseline assessment and were excluded, leaving 653 patients in total. Due to attrition, primary outcome analyses were of 550 patients (266 in the sertraline group and 284 in the placebo group; 85% follow-up that did not differ by treatment allocation). We found no evidence that sertraline led to a clinically meaningful reduction in depressive symptoms at 6 weeks. The mean 6-week PHQ-9 score was 7·98 (SD 5·63) in the sertraline group and 8·76 (5·86) in the placebo group (adjusted proportional difference 0·95, 95% CI 0·85–1·07; p=0·41). However, for secondary outcomes, we found evidence that sertraline led to reduced anxiety symptoms, better mental (but not physical) health-related quality of life, and self-reported improvements in mental health. We observed weak evidence that depressive symptoms were reduced by sertraline at 12 weeks. We recorded seven adverse events—four for sertraline and three for placebo, and adverse events did not differ by treatment allocation. Three adverse events were classified as serious—two in the sertraline group and one in the placebo group. One serious adverse event in the sertraline group was classified as possibly related to study medication. Interpretation Sertraline is unlikely to reduce depressive symptoms within 6 weeks in primary care but we observed improvements in anxiety, quality of life, and self-rated mental health, which are likely to be clinically important. Our findings support the prescription of SSRI antidepressants in a wider group of participants than previously thought, including those with mild to moderate symptoms who do not meet diagnostic criteria for depression or generalised anxiety disorder.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans, Sertraline, Treatment Outcome, Severity of Illness Index, Double-Blind Method, Depressive Disorder, Time Factors, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Female, Male, Young Adult, United Kingdom, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Oct 2019 09:02 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Jan 2023 00:24 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30366-9 |
| Open Access URL: | https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30366-9 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3056847 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
