Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study



Drakesmith, Mark, Collins, Brendan ORCID: 0000-0002-3023-8189, Jones, Angela, Nnoaham, Kelechi and Thomas, Daniel Rhys
(2022) Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 22 (1). 1190-.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Mass community testing for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow devices (LFDs) aims to reduce prevalence in the community. However its effectiveness as a public heath intervention is disputed.<h4>Method</h4>Data from a mass testing pilot in the Borough of Merthyr Tydfil in late 2020 was used to model cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions and deaths prevented. Further economic analysis with a healthcare perspective assessed cost-effectiveness in terms of healthcare costs avoided and QALYs gained.<h4>Results</h4>An initial conservative estimate of 360 (95% CI: 311-418) cases were prevented by the mass testing, representing a would-be reduction of 11% of all cases diagnosed in Merthyr Tydfil residents during the same period. Modelling healthcare burden estimates that 24 (16-36) hospitalizations, 5 (3-6) ICU admissions and 15 (11-20) deaths were prevented, representing 6.37%, 11.1% and 8.2%, respectively of the actual counts during the same period. A less conservative, best-case scenario predicts 2333 (1764-3115) cases prevented, representing 80% reduction in would-be cases. Cost -effectiveness analysis indicates 108 (80-143) QALYs gained, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2,143 (£860-£4,175) per QALY gained and net monetary benefit of £6.2 m (£4.5 m-£8.4 m). In the best-case scenario, this increases to £15.9 m (£12.3 m-£20.5 m).<h4>Conclusions</h4>A non-negligible number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths were prevented by the mass testing pilot. Considering QALYs gained and healthcare costs avoided, the pilot was cost-effective. These findings suggest mass testing with LFDs in areas of high prevalence (> 2%) is likely to provide significant public health benefit. It is not yet clear whether similar benefits will be obtained in low prevalence settings or with vaccination rollout.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, Lateral flow test, Mass testing, Community testing, Cost-effectiveness, Economic analysis, Epidemiological modelling, QALYs
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2022 10:19
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 20:41
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3
Open Access URL: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/article...
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3164979