Cansdale, Lottie Grace, Kelly, Gabriella, Khashan, Ali, Malata, Address, Kachale, Fannie, Lissauer, David 
ORCID: 0000-0002-7878-2327, Yosefe, Simeon, Roberts, James, Woodworth, Simon, Mmbaga, Blandina et al (show 2 more authors)
(2022)
Use of mHealth tools to register birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
BMJ OPEN, 12 (10).
e063886-.
Abstract
<h4>Objective</h4>Accurate reporting of birth outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is essential. Mobile health (mHealth) tools have been proposed as a replacement for conventional paper-based registers. mHealth could provide timely data for individual facilities and health departments, as well as capture deliveries outside facilities. This scoping review evaluates which mHealth tools have been reported to birth outcomes in the delivering room in LMICs and documents their reported advantages and drawbacks.<h4>Design</h4>A scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and the mHealth evidence reporting and assessment checklist for evaluating mHealth interventions.<h4>Data sources</h4>PubMed, CINAHL and Global Health were searched for records until 3 February 2022 with no earliest date limit.<h4>Eligibility criteria</h4>Studies were included where healthcare workers used mHealth tools in LMICs to record birth outcomes. Exclusion criteria included mHealth not being used at the point of delivery, non-peer reviewed literature and studies not written in English.<h4>Data extraction and synthesis</h4>Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Common themes among studies were identified.<h4>Results</h4>640 records were screened, 21 of which met the inclusion criteria, describing 15 different mHealth tools. We identified six themes: (1) digital tools for labour monitoring (8 studies); (2) digital data collection of specific birth outcomes (3 studies); (3) digital technologies used in community settings (6 studies); (4) attitudes of healthcare workers (10 studies); (5) paper versus electronic data collection (3 studies) and (6) infrastructure, interoperability and sustainability (8 studies).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Several mHealth technologies are reported to have the capability to record birth outcomes at delivery, but none were identified that were designed solely for that purpose. Use of digital delivery registers appears feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers, but definitive evaluations are lacking. Further assessment of the sustainability of technologies and their ability to integrate with existing health information systems is needed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | obstetrics, information technology, health informatics |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Feb 2023 10:35 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Feb 2023 10:35 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063886 |
| Open Access URL: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/10/e063886 |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3168205 |
Dimensions
Dimensions
