Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: Economic evaluation of the novel butterfly device in a UK setting.

Edwards, Rhiannon T, Ezeofor, Victory, Bryning, Lucy, Anthony, Bethany F, Charles, Joanna M and Weeks, Andrew ORCID: 0000-0002-1909-337X (2023) Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: Economic evaluation of the novel butterfly device in a UK setting. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 283. pp. 149-157.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Objectives</h4>To explore the cost-effectiveness of a novel PPH device as compared with usual care.<h4>Design</h4>A decision analytical model was used to explore the cost-effectiveness of the PPH Butterfly device compared with usual care. This was part of a United Kingdom, UK, clinical trial ISRCTN15452399 using a matched historical cohort who had standard PPH management without the use of the PPH Butterfly device. The economic evaluation was conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.<h4>Setting</h4>Liverpool Women's Hospital, UK.<h4>Participants</h4>57 women with 113 matched controls.<h4>Intervention</h4>The PPH Butterfly is a novel device that has been invented and developed in the UK to facilitate bimanual compression of the uterus in the treatment of PPH.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Main outcome measures included healthcare costs, blood loss, and maternal morbidity events.<h4>Results</h4>Mean treatment costs in the Butterfly cohort were £3,459.66 as compared with standard care £3,223.93. Treatment with the Butterfly device resulted in decreased total blood loss in comparison with standard care. The Butterfly device had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3,795.78 per PPH progression avoided (defined as ≤ 1000 ml additional blood loss from device insertion point). If the NHS is prepared to pay £8,500 per PPH progression avoided, then the Butterfly device is cost-effective with a probability of 87 percent. In the PPH Butterfly treatment arm there were 9% fewer cases of massive obstetric haemorrhage (severe PPH of more than 2000mls or more than 4 units of blood transfusion required) recorded as compared with the standard care historical cohort. As a low-cost device, the PPH Butterfly device is cost-effective but can be cost-saving to the NHS.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The PPH pathway can result in high-cost resource use such as blood transfusion or high dependence unit hospital stays. The Butterfly device is a relative low-cost device in a UK NHS setting with a high probability of being cost-effective. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) can use this evidence in considering the adoption of innovative technologies such as the Butterfly device in the NHS. Extrapolation on an international scale to lower and middle-income countries could prevent mortality associated with PPH.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Animals, Humans, Butterflies, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Pregnancy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, State Medicine, Female, United Kingdom
Divisions:	Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Depositing User:	Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited:	02 May 2023 10:08
Last Modified:	02 May 2023 10:08
DOI:	10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.020
Open Access URL:	https://www.ejog.org/article/S0301-2115(23)00079-9...
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
URI:	https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3170076