Selective outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials including participants with stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review.



Syed, Mohshin, Martin, Helena, Sena, Emily S, Williamson, Paula R ORCID: 0000-0001-9802-6636 and Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
(2023) Selective outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials including participants with stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review. European stroke journal, 8 (4). p. 23969873231194811.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Introduction</h4>The prevalence of outcome reporting bias (ORB, i.e. selective reporting according to the results observed) across primary outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including participants with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is unknown.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 3 February 2021 for reviews published 2008-2020 with at least one RCT of a therapeutic intervention, for participants with stroke or TIA, and a safety or efficacy outcome. We took a random sample of these RCTs and included those with a trial registry record or protocol published before reporting results. Two reviewers assessed discrepancies in outcome reporting across the trial registry record, protocol, statistical analysis plan, and publication for each RCT, using the classification system designed by the Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials group.<h4>Results</h4>Of 600 RCTs, we identified a trial registry record in 120 (20%), a protocol in 28 (5%), and a statistical analysis plan in 5 (1%) with 123 (21%) distinct RCTs being eligible for assessment: 110 (89%, 95% CI 83-94) were at no risk, 7 (6%, 95% CI 3-11) RCTs were at low risk, and 6 (5%, 95% CI 2-10) were at high risk of ORB.<h4>Discussion</h4>The prevalence of ORB in primary outcomes was low in stroke/TIA RCTs that were included in Cochrane reviews and had an identifiable trial registry record or protocol. Concerningly, we were unable to identify a trial registry record or protocol in most of our sample.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Work is needed to further reduce ORB in stroke/TIA RCTs and explore the generalisability of these findings to RCTs outside of Cochrane reviews or without a registry record or protocol, as well as to secondary outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Stroke, transient ischaemic attack, outcome reporting bias, selective outcome reporting, randomised controlled trial
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Population Health
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 26 Sep 2023 09:25
Last Modified: 24 Nov 2023 12:31
DOI: 10.1177/23969873231194811
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873231194811
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3173055