Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient.



Guryel, Enis, McEwan, Jo, Qureshi, Amir A, Robertson, Alastair, Ahluwalia, Raju, Open Ankle Fracture of the Frail (OAFF) Collaborative Group, , OAFF Collaborative Group, , Baxter, Mark, Mason, Lyndon ORCID: 0000-0002-0371-3183, Eardley, Will
et al (show 5 more authors) (2024) Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient. Bone & joint open, 5 (3). pp. 236-242.

Access the full-text of this item by clicking on the Open Access link.

Abstract

<h4>Aims</h4>Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest.<h4>Methods</h4>A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS).<h4>Results</h4>In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: OAFF Collaborative Group, Open Ankle Fracture of the Frail (OAFF) Collaborative Group
Divisions: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences > Institute of Life Courses and Medical Sciences > School of Medicine
Depositing User: Symplectic Admin
Date Deposited: 09 Apr 2024 08:48
Last Modified: 09 Apr 2024 13:20
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.53.bjo-2023-0155.r1
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0155...
Related URLs:
URI: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3180166